Readers Exchange Art Carpenter, depository librarian and Associate Professor of Library Science at Weber State University in Ogden, UT, writes: In my daily work as depository librarian, two things became increasingly clear: 1) that Government publications were being underutilized in proportion to their value, and 2) that effective promotion, understanding, and utilization of Government publications require a local team effort. In the article below he shares his idea of using subject librarians as assistants to the depository librarian in making effective use of depository information products. THE SUBJECT BIBLIOGRAPHER AND THE UTILIZATION OF GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS by Art Carpenter Weber State University, Ogden, UT One of the persistent challenges which the Federal Depository Library Program has had to face is the underutilization of Government publications, especially in proportion to their value. One could cite several causes, many of which are the result of a shortage of skilled intermediaries. Depository librarians are, of course, the most qualified for this role, but under-staffing inhibits their effectiveness. Since approximately two-thirds of all Federal depositories in the United States are located on college campuses, they have a special opportunity to influence the utilization of Government publications, especially if the academic library's organizational structure includes subject librarians, sometimes referred to as subject bibliographers. If these specialists could, as part of their assignment, act in partnership with the depository librarian as his/her assistants, the pool of intermediaries could be enlarged considerably. The possibilities of this sort of teamwork to positively affect utilization are intriguing. Generally, it would divide the labor involved in managing a medium-to-large-sized depository library. One of the greatest benefits could be realized in collection management. The responsibility for maintaining the depository's item selection profile could be divided among the several bibliographers according to the subject expertise of each. Within the List of Classes one finds many "subject fits." For example, the business/economics bibliographer could have stewardship over most of the "IC" and "L" classes, and the science/technology bibliographer over most of the "A," "E," "EP," and "NAS" classes. The depository librarian would be responsible for interdisciplinary items and any parts of the selection profile where no clear-cut subject match exists. Bibliographers skilled in Government publications could have a dramatic influence on the user's ability to understand the value and organization of Government information if instruction in Government publications were to be integrated by the bibliographers into their discipline-specific bibliographic instruction. Bibliographers could assist with the daunting, yet necessary task of conducting studies to assess user needs, evaluate the collection, and analyze existing utilization patterns and problems. As bibliographers become trained and knowledgeable in the use of Government publications in all its formats, expertise within their individual subject specializations will grow, and they become the complete information broker for their subject specialty. At this level, they are prepared to act as that critical human interface, the expert who can identify, locate, access, interpret, customize, and utilize Government information. Bibliographers with the will, and library administrators with the commitment, can transform availability into use toward a more productive, more culturally enriched, and more democratically involved America.