EEBO in
Education / Assignments / Professor Huston Diehl
8:102
Renaissance Literature and Culture
Prof. Huston Diehl
Fall 2002
ASSIGNMENT 2: PRIMARY TEXTS
DUE: October 14 [note change of deadline]
"The perception of the distance [that separates us from the
people
of pre-industrial Europe] may serve as a starting point of an
investigation,
for anthropologists have found that the best points of entry in
an attempt
to penetrate an alien culture can be those where it seems to be
most opaque.
When you realize that you are not getting something--a joke, a
proverb,
a ceremony--that is particularly meaningful to the natives, you
can see
where to grasp a foreign system of meaning in order to unravel
it."
--Robert Darnton, The Great Cat Massacre
This assignment is designed to give you practice reading and interpreting
primary texts from the sixteenth-century and early seventeenth-century
texts. For the purposes of this assignment, you may use any text
printed in England between 1558 and 1642 that is not a work of
poetry, fiction, or dramatic literature. Ideally, you will choose
a text that will be relevant to the topic of your final, research
paper.
Once you have chosen your text, complete the following exercises:
1. First, identify and describe at least ten distinguishing
characteristics of the primary text you have chosen. You may want
to describe the organizing principles of your text; the prefatory
materials (e.g., title page, frontispiece, dedicatory verses,
introduction); the illustrations; the marginalia. You may want
to take note of some distinctive aspects of the author’s
style or argument (e.g., striking metaphors, allusions, puns;
appeals to authority; kinds of arguments; types of supporting
evidence). Or you may want to describe the way the text constructs
its readers and its author and locates itself in its culture.
Feel free to present these characteristics as a simple list.
2. Next, try to state, in a couple of sentences, the central
goal or purpose of your text. Please do not summarize the actual
content or specific arguments of your text.
3. Then, identify two to five things about your text that strike
you (an American undergraduate in the year 2002) as puzzling,
strange, illogical, perhaps even incomprehensible. What are you
not getting? What seems alien to your contemporary way of seeing
the world?
4. Finally, write a brief essay in which you speculate about how
the things that puzzle you about your text may provide “a
point of entry” into early modern culture. How might you
use this text, and whatever it is that you are not “getting”
about it, to help you “grasp a foreign system of meaning
in order to unravel it"? You need not at this stage come
up with a full explanation of what puzzles you or make any breakthrough
discoveries, but do try to see how what strikes you as strange
may open up some aspect of early modern culture for your examination.
Your essay should be about two or three typewritten pages, double
spaced. Base your discussion solely on your own analysis of your
artifact; do not consult outside sources. Feel free to follow
your hunches, raise questions you're not sure you can answer,
advance hypothetical arguments, take risks. As an informal exercise,
your essay need not be polished or fully realized; it should be
exploratory--and fun.