From Evidence-based Medicine to Evidence-Based
Social Work
The evidence-based movement in the health sciences is over a decade
old, and its beginnings
are tied to evidence-based practice in medicine.
The first appearance of the term evidence-based
medicine occurred in
the fall of 1990 in a document describing the residency program at
Canada’s
McMaster University:
Residents are taught to develop an attitude of “enlightened
skepticism” toward the application
of diagnostic, therapeutic,
and prognostic technologies in their day-to-day management of patients.
This approach, which has been called “evidence-based medicine,” is
based on principles outlined
in the text Clinical Epidemiology.
The goal is to be aware of the evidence on which one’s practice
is based, the soundness of the
evidence, and the strength of inference
the evidence permits. The strategy employed requires a
clear delineation
of the relevant question(s); a thorough search of the literature relating
to the
questions; a critical appraisal of the evidence, and its applicability
to the clinical situation; and
a balanced application of the conclusions
to the clinical problem.
[Source: Guyatt, G. and Drummond Rennie. 2002. User’s
Guides to the Medical Literature: A
Manual for Evidence-Based Practice.
Chicago: American Medical Association, p. xiv.]
Some of the key concepts in this description are evidence and critical
appraisal. Evidence can be
defined as that “which furnishes proof,” and
critical appraisal can be defined as an evaluation
process “which
determines the significance or worth of something by careful appraisal
and study.”
These concepts became a fundamental principle for
a new approach to patient care, using evidence-
based principles and
a philosophy that evidence from the medical literature should support
clinical
decisions. As a body of literature began to emerge, it was
soon recognized that evidence-based
medicine approaches could be applied
to other fields, including social work. Within this field,
some of
the principal user groups are practitioners, policy makers, researchers,
the general public,
and information professionals.
There are differences between the two disciplines of medicine
and social work.
| |
Social Work |
Medicine |
Primary Focus |
Individuals, Families, Communities |
Individuals |
Emphasis |
Diagnosis |
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Treatment |
Individuals, Families, Communities |
Whole Patient |
Paradigm |
Interventions aimed at Environment, Human Behavior and Lifestyle,
and Medical Care |
Medical Care |
[Adapted from :
Fineberg, Harvey, MD, PhD, Dean, Harvard University School
of Public Health, 1990. Distinctions Between Public Health
and Medicine. On the web site of the University of Texas School
of Public Health at Houston: Community-Based Public Health
Program. |
As shown on the chart above, social work research and practice,
similar to public health, is aimed
at the broader community. Evidence-based
approaches within this context require an understanding
of the complexities
of organizational structures, interactions, and myriad other dynamics
that shape
and influence decision making at the local, state, regional,
and national levels within which
social
work operates and within which policies and programs are established.
Role of Librarians and Information Professionals in Evidence-Based
Social Work
Librarians and information professionals are trained in the skills
and procedures needed for applying
evidence-based principles, including
information retrieval and evaluation of search strategies and
results.
Librarians and information professionals provide training and instruction
on evidence-based
social work concepts, develop web-based resources
and guides to evidence-based sources, consult on
search strategies
and techniques for identifying the evidence-based literature, and apply
criteria
for assessing and evaluating the reliability and validity
of search results.